Friday, September 4, 2015

Judge Raps Knuckles of University Over Affirmative Consent Rule for Sexual Assault

Posted in Gender Issues


Contact: Gina Lauterio

Telephone: 301-801-0608

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Judge Raps Knuckles of University Over
Affirmative Consent Rule for Sexual Assault

WASHINGTON / August 12, 2015 – A Tennessee judge has just ruled that the affirmative consent standard used by the University of Tennessee-Chattanooga was unfair because the rule “erroneously shifted the burden of proof” to the defendant, robbing the student of his due process rights. Judge Carol McCoy noted that “requiring the accused to affirmatively provide consent… is flawed and untenable if due process is to be afforded to the accused.”

The decision can be read here

The University of Tennessee-Chattanooga (UTC) sexual assault policy stated, “Consent is given by an affirmative verbal response or acts that are unmistakable in their meaning. Consent to one form of sexual activity does not mean consent is given to another type of sexual activity.”

The ruling also highlighted undue interference in the adjudication process. The UTC Administrative Law Judge initially found Corey Mock, the defendant, to be innocent. Following a request by the UTC Chancellor, the Administrative Law Judge reversed her decision, but did not alter any of her original 49 specific findings.

George Washington Law School professor John Banzhaf notes about the UTC case that “if the Constitution prohibits a yes means yes standard of consent…that cannot be changed by legislation, by federal agencies, or even by the colleges themselves.”

The UTC ruling follows two other recent judicial decisions which found university sexual assault proceedings violated the due process rights of the accused. 

In California, Superior Court Judge Joel Pressman ruled in July that the University of California-San Diego unfairly expelled a student for sexual activities that were allegedly non-consensual. And in Virginia, federal judge Norman Moon ruled last week that Washington and Lee University’s truncated adjudication process “plausibly support a Title IX claim” by the plaintiff.

“Due process is a right afforded by the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment,” explains SAVE spokesperson Sheryle Hutter. “Abridging this fundamental right, as many state universities are trying to do, has no justification in a nation that cherishes civil rights and the rule of law.” 

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault:


Shared Parenting Would Benefit Children Of Divorce

Posted in Parenting 8/10/2015

"... More than one-third of our states are taking steps toward allowing more children to grow up with both parents in their lives when parents split, and now is the time for Pennsylvania to join this crucial movement. ..."

Read the entire article: 

August Is National Child Support Awareness Month

Posted in Child Support 8/10/2015

"... Child Support Awareness Month is a time to recognize the critical role child support plays in the lives of millions of children. Often, child support payments are all that prevent children from living in dire poverty, and child support is generally the second and sometimes largest source of income for families receiving it. ..."

Read the entire article: